Skip to main content

What Do You Call a Group of Theologians?

I think the answer should be "an argument", but perhaps that's unfair. I can test my theory this next week, which sees the start of the annual Society for the Study of Theology (UK) conference on the theme of Holy Writ? (The question mark is very suggestive). It looks really good, and the list of plenary speakers is great: Alex Samely (Manchester); Morwenna Ludlow (Exeter); Henk van den Belt (Amsterdam); Walter Moberly (Durham); Anthony Thiselton (Nottingham); Hugh Pyper (Sheffield). The conference lasts several days and is convening this year at York University. I hope to be able to blog a few thoughts from the conference and some info about the plenary sessions, but I shall be presenting a paper at one of the themed seminars on Wednesday afternoon on the interpretation of Barth's ethics of responsibility so may be a bit distracted until then.

So watch this space for more info...

Comments

Rev R Marszalek said…
Sounds really interesting, hope it's thrilling. I am discovering again how helpful Barth can be and will apply his thinking to my exegesis of Romans 7 'divided man.'
8 April 2011 at 21:30
Tintin727272 said…
A confusion of theologians....
8 April 2011 at 22:30
Tintin727272 said…
A waffle of theologians.
8 April 2011 at 22:30
Tintin727272 said…
If there are three of them a trinity of theologians.
8 April 2011 at 22:32
Ian Paul said…
Do blog the papers when you can. Nice revamp to blog!
8 April 2011 at 22:39
Anonymous said…
A "respectful disagreement" of theologians?
8 April 2011 at 23:17
Michael Leyden... said…
Thanks TinTin and Grumpy Cleric for your contributions...I do like a waffle of theologians quite a lot, it suggests a particular thinking pose to my mind (best not explored), but there's something beautifully restrained about "a respectful disagreement" of theologians. Not as grumpy as your username suggests brother Cleric...
9 April 2011 at 11:53
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Paul Nimmo on Schleiermacher

Once again it's been a while since I blogged anything, but I thought I would flag-up this clip from the increasingly successful Modern Theology  Timeline created by Tim Hull at St John's College Nottingham, UK. This is a recent interview Tim did with the Edinburgh based scholar Paul Nimmo on Friedrich Schleiermacher. It is a really good interview, and will go a long way to rehabilitating FDES for those who mis-read Barth and reject him outright. Happy watching!
1 comment
Continue reading...

Floor tiles, theology, and divine interruption

Today I have had quite a cultured day: we had a family trip down to the Tate Gallery at Liverpool's Albert Dock. It was a welcome relief after a long and difficult week. One of the exhibits at the gallery got me thinking - as I guess art should - and also got me chuckling. Finally it got me theologizing. The exhibit was this: It is, as you can see, a series of floor tiles laid out in a square pattern. It's called "144 Magnesium Square" by American artist  Carl Andre (b.1935). If you are thinking that there must be more to it, you are wrong. That's it. Tiles laid out and cemented to the floor (not exactly very well either - my dad, who is a professional tiler, would not be pleased). And that's what got me thinking and chuckling. The inevitable question to ask when you witness something as plain and ordinary as floor tiles is "is this art?" For many people viewing the exhibit alongside me today, it plainly wasn't: they were saying so quite aud
2 comments
Continue reading...