Skip to main content

Nurturing Complex Vocations

Earlier this week I was at Lambeth Palace, the London home of the Archbishop of Canterbury, for a meeting of young priest-theologians. I was very excited to be invited along - not least because I'm not yet ordained to the Priesthood and I haven't finished my PhD so calling myself a priest-theologian seems premature. Nonetheless, it was a good day for me. I have long struggled to hold together the two the aspects of my sense of vocation: that of a parish priest, and that of an academic theologian. So, to be invited along to a meeting addressing exactly that issue, and finding like-minded people with a similar vocation, was a real treat. Several times during my training, and even a little since moving into full-time ordained ministry, I have come across a negative attitude towards academia from other ordained colleagues. Many pose the question of the practicality of systematic theology or biblical studies for example, or the "relevance" of this for a congregation. I have some sympathy with this position, but only a little: the rise of practical theology has, to my mind, overlooked the need to allow our thought life to be shaped and moulded theologically. Other colleagues can be quite scathing to those of us engaged in reading and thinking theology on a regular basis: it takes time away from the "real" stuff of mission and ministry in the parish. Inevitably when ministers get together there is a competition about who is the busiest, or "who has the least time to sit around and read books" as it can sometimes feel. To find, as I have, a supportive incumbent is relatively rare for curates and assistant ministers. So, to hold a national meeting recognizing and affirming the vocation of scholar-priests was a good thing.

We were addressed in the morning by Professor Sarah Coakley and members of the Littlemore Group, and then by AB Rowan in the afternoon. Here are some of my highlights recorded as quotes from the various speakers (I'm afraid in my rushed notes I did not atttribute them properly):

"Out of the Priest-scholar comes a particular kind of theology, rooted in practices of parish-life but charged with academic rigour...The aim of this kind of ministry is to reignite the imagination of the nation for Christ"
"The Priest-theologian is some-one who can't regularly flourish without opportunity to read and talk theology"
"For the Priest-theologian the love of study is connected to the love of God, and understood and exercised as a gift from God...this is a non-utilitarian vision of study, like prayer and praise it is enacted out of love for God"
"The Church is a learning community; it is a community of disciples...A disciple is some-one who hasn't finished learning...the responsbility of the Priest-scholar is to make connections and aid the ongoing discipleship of the whole Body of Christ..."

One of the questions that struck me through the day was to do with the way the language of priest-scholar or priest-theologian is often used in such a way that "priest" acts adjectively and "scholar" or "theologian" as the noun. To my mind this often seems to imply something about the priorities of this kind of ministry to those who do not share that vocation, i.e. that the main concern is academia. Such a feeling can be forgiven since it can often appear to be true: many of the most well-known priest-scholars hold university lectureships and other positions and engage in parish ministry in thier spare time or at least part-time. Several high-profile clergy in the UK are mostly known for their scholarly output - Tom Wright and Rowan Williams are two good examples. But, as some of the quotations above hopefully suggest, the meeting at Lambeth brought together many who, like me, are working full time in parish ministry and contributing to the academy alongside that (perhaps we might be "scholar-priests"?) along with those who are also ordained full-time academics.

I came away from Lambeth Palace and walked down the South Bankof the Thames with a strong sense that God is at work in raising up priest-scholars in the Church of England for a new generation of questions, and for new mission and ministry that is culturally appropriate. Not least to encourage and enable thoughful discipleship in the church in the 21st century. Nonetheless, there remains the need for a culture shift in the wider church. In the open-evangelical tradition from which I have come there needs to be a recognition that Priest-theologians can make creative contributions to the real life issues that people face in the church and in the world. I can't speak for other traditions, but I'd be interested to know, what do you think?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

David Clough on Barth

For those who are interested, here  is an interview with Professor David Clough from earlier this year on the subject of Barth's theological development. It has recently made its way online...alas, the interviewer (me!) has been edited out. The interview was for a new DVD Interactive Multimedia Timeline created  by R ev. Dr Tim Hull at St John's College Nottingham. Several high quality scholars agreed to be interviewed, including Dr Karen Kilby, Dr Ben Fulford, Professor Antony Thiselton, Professor David Fergusson, and several others forthcoming. David Clough is Professor of Theological Ethics at Chester University, UK, and wrote his doctoral thesis on the interpretation of Barth's ethics. It was published in 2005 as, Ethics in Crisis: Interpreting Barth's Ethics (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005).

Godpod and theological resources

I have had a great evening listening to a whole stack of theological podcasts from St Paul's Theological Centre, London, UK. There are over 60 podcasts available from the St Paul's website or on iTunes that cover a whole range of topics in Christian ethics, spirituality, systematic theology, history, Christian biography etc.with experts from across UK. The format is pretty simple: a three way discussion between Dr Jane Williams, Revd Dr Mike Lloyd, Revd Dr Graham Tomlin and a special guest or two each session (I've listenind to Prof. Nigel Biggar, Prof. NT Wright, Dr David Hilborn, Prof. Andrew Walker, Prof. Alister McGrath, and a hosts of others so far). Each lasts a bit less than an hour, but there's plenty to think about and chew over. If you're looking for some really good input, and some fun theological discussion from leading evangelical thinkers, then head over to St Paul's Centre and their Godpod page.

What Do You Call a Group of Theologians?

I think the answer should be "an argument", but perhaps that's unfair. I can test my theory this next week, which sees the start of the annual Society for the Study of Theology (UK) conference on the theme of Holy Writ? (The question mark is very suggestive). It looks really good, and the list of plenary speakers is great: Alex Samely (Manchester); Morwenna Ludlow (Exeter); Henk van den Belt (Amsterdam); Walter Moberly (Durham); Anthony Thiselton (Nottingham); Hugh Pyper (Sheffield). The conference lasts several days and is convening this year at York University. I hope to be able to blog a few thoughts from the conference and some info about the plenary sessions, but I shall be presenting a paper at one of the themed seminars on Wednesday afternoon on the interpretation of Barth's ethics of responsibility so may be a bit distracted until then. So watch this space for more info...